Moment of Inertia Calculator
Compute the moment of inertia of a point mass about a rotation axis using I = m r². Useful for back-of-the-envelope estimates of angular response to applied torque.
Category: Physics
Moment of Inertia Calculator Inputs
Moment of Inertia Calculator Formula
Equation
I = m \, r^2
Excel Formula
=I=mPOWER(r,2)
Variables
- Mass m (kg) — Mass of the point particle (kg).
- Distance r from axis (m) — Perpendicular distance from the rotation axis to the mass (m).
How the Moment of Inertia Calculator Works
The moment of inertia I is the rotational analogue of mass: it measures how resistant an object is to changes in its rotational motion. For a single point mass, I grows with the square of the distance to the rotation axis, so arrangement matters as much as mass itself.
The core relationship is I = m \, r^2. Typical inputs include Mass m, Distance r from axis.
Enter your values in the moment of inertia calculator above, review the step-by-step solution, and compare against the worked examples below so you can see how each input changes the result. This free online physics tool is built for homework, design checks, and professional verification.
Moment of Inertia Calculator Theory & Explanation
Definition
For a single point mass at perpendicular distance r from the axis of rotation, the moment of inertia is
I = m \, r^2
Why r appears squared
A particle twice as far from the axis is four times harder to spin up, because both linear speed and required centripetal-direction momentum grow linearly with r. This is why figure skaters pull in their arms: reducing r is the only way to spin faster, since m can't change.
Common shapes (extended bodies)
For continuous bodies, I is an integral over the volume: I = ∫ r^2 \, dm. Resulting formulas for common geometries are summarized below (where k is the dimensionless shape factor and r is the characteristic radius):
\beginarraylll\textThin rod about center & (1)/(12) m L^2 & \\ \textThin rod about end & (1)/(3) m L^2 & \\ \textSolid disk/cylinder about center & (1)/(2) m r^2 & \\ \textHollow sphere & (2)/(3) m r^2 & \\ \textSolid sphere & (2)/(5) m r^2 & \endarray
Parallel-axis theorem
If you know I about an axis through the center of mass, you can shift to a parallel axis at distance d by adding m d²:
I = I_\mathrmcm + m \, d^2
Units and Newton's second law for rotation
I is measured in \mathrmkg· m^2. It appears in the rotational form of Newton's second law:
\tau_\mathrmnet = I \, α
Standard Shapes and Why the Coefficient Differs
Every common body has I = c\,MR^2 for some coefficient c that depends purely on how the mass is distributed relative to the axis. A thin hoop about its centre has c = 1; a solid disc or cylinder has c = 1/2; a solid sphere has c = 2/5; a thin spherical shell has c = 2/3; a rod about its centre has I = ML^2/12, rising to ML^2/3 about one end.
The pattern is that mass far from the axis counts disproportionately, because the contribution goes as distance *squared*. A hoop keeps all its mass at radius R, so it has the largest coefficient; a solid sphere concentrates much of its mass near the centre and has the smallest. This is exactly why a hoop rolls down a slope more slowly than a solid ball of identical mass and radius: more of the released potential energy goes into rotation rather than translation.
I = ∫ r^2\,dm = c\,MR^2
The Parallel-Axis Theorem
Tables almost always quote the moment of inertia about an axis through the centre of mass. To shift to any parallel axis a distance d away, add Md^2.
This one line handles most real problems. A rod pivoted at its end has I = ML^2/12 + M(L/2)^2 = ML^2/3, recovering the standard result. A compound body — a flywheel with a hub, a pendulum with a rod and a bob — is handled by computing each part about its own centre, shifting each to the common axis, and adding. Note that the correction is always positive: the centroidal axis gives the smallest moment of inertia of any parallel axis, which is why balanced machinery is mounted through its centre of mass.
I = I_\textcm + Md^2
Rotational Energy, Rolling and Flywheels
A rotating body stores K = \tfrac12I\omega^2. A body that both rolls and translates carries both terms, and for rolling without slipping v = \omega R ties them together — which is what lets you predict rolling races without solving any forces.
Flywheels exploit the same relationship in reverse. Because energy goes as \omega^2 but only linearly with I, spinning faster stores far more energy than adding mass, so modern flywheel storage uses light composite rotors at very high speed rather than heavy steel at low speed. The limit is material strength: hoop stress in the rim grows as \rho v^2, so the maximum stored energy per unit mass depends on the ratio of tensile strength to density, not on size.
K_\textrot = \tfrac12I\omega^2, \qquad K_\texttotal = \tfrac12Mv^2 + \tfrac12I\omega^2
Moment of Inertia Calculator Worked Examples
Worked Example
Inputs
- mass: 2
- radius: 0.5
Result: momentOfInertia: 0.5 angularEquivalentMass: 0.5
Explanation
A 2 kg point mass placed 0.5 m from a pivot has moment of inertia I = 2 × (0.5)² = 0.5 kg·m². Doubling r to 1.0 m would quadruple I to 2.0 kg·m², making the same torque produce only one-quarter of the angular acceleration.
Second Scenario
Inputs
- mass: 3.5
- radius: 0.5
Result: momentOfInertia: 0.5 angularEquivalentMass: 0.5
Explanation
This scenario uses different inputs (mass = 3.5, radius = 0.5) to show how changing one variable affects the moment of inertia result. Run the calculator above with these values to get the exact updated output with step-by-step work.
Common Moment of Inertia Calculator Use Cases
- Physics problem sets and labs
- Engineering design checks
- Unit and formula verification
- Moment of Inertia homework and study
- Moment of Inertia design and analysis
Moment of Inertia Calculator FAQs
Does the formula differ for extended objects?
Yes. For a point mass it is I = m r². For an extended body you integrate over the volume (I = ∫ r² dm), giving formula-dependent shape factors k such that I = k m r² (e.g. k = 1/2 for a solid disk, 2/5 for a solid sphere).
Does the choice of axis matter?
Yes — the moment of inertia depends on which axis you rotate about. Two objects with the same mass can have very different I values if they have different shapes or different axis placement. The parallel-axis theorem (I_cm + m d²) shifts I from the center-of-mass axis to a parallel axis offset by d.
Is moment of inertia conserved?
I itself is a property of a body about an axis and is constant for a rigid body. However, the rotational kinetic energy (½ I ω²) can change as ω changes, just as translational kinetic energy (½ m v²) can change. The closer the mass is to the axis, the lower the I and the higher the achievable angular velocity for a given amount of energy.
Why isn't the radius measured along the arm?
Only the perpendicular distance from the mass element to the rotation axis contributes to r². A particle lying on the axis contributes zero to I — that is why the center-of-mass axis matters: it minimizes I.
Why do a hollow and a solid cylinder of the same mass roll down a slope at different rates?
The hollow cylinder keeps all its mass at the rim, giving I = MR² against MR²/2 for the solid one. More of the released potential energy therefore goes into rotation rather than forward motion, so the hollow cylinder accelerates more slowly and loses the race. Notably the result does not depend on mass or radius at all — only on the shape coefficient.